Findings · Turtles · a proxy, not a measurement

Nest temperature this season: a proxy.

The water is warmer this year. Will more female turtles hatch, and is that good? Nobody measures the sand here, so this page builds a plain proxy from the village weather station, compares 2026 with the two summers before it, and leaves the thresholds to the published science. Short answer: probably more females, mostly from the late-season nests. One year like this does little to the population. A run of them would matter.

On-site station + NOAA OISST · July–September 2024, 2025, 2026 · Olive Ridley, Lepidochelys olivacea · 27 September 2026
Air, 25 Jul–18 Sep 2026
vs 2024 / 2025
+1.1 / +1.2 °C
29.3 vs 28.2 and 28.0 °C daily mean
Sea surface, Jul–Sep 2026
vs 1982–2025 normal
+1.21 °C
2024 +0.55 · 2025 +0.19
Rain in the same window
2024 · 2025 · 2026
325 · 178 · 134 mm
less rain, less cooling of the sand
Pivotal temperature
East Pacific Olive Ridley
30.46 °C
both sexes ≈29.3–31.6 °C · published

An Olive Ridley's sex is not in its genes. It is set by the temperature of the sand around the egg during the middle third of incubation, which runs about 45–55 days here. Warmer than the pivotal temperature and the clutch comes out mostly female; cooler and mostly male. The Olive Ridley nests on this coast from roughly July to December, and the owner's question this September was simple: the sea is warm this year; what does that do to the nests?

The honest starting point is that there are no sand or nest temperature measurements at La Saladita. What exists is the village weather station (air temperature and rain every five minutes) and the satellite sea-surface record. So this page builds a proxy, says exactly how, compares years with it rather than pretending it is sand, and takes the biology (pivotal temperature, the range that gives both sexes, the heat that kills embryos) only from published studies, cited below.

The proxy · stated plainly

A week of air, minus the rain.

For each day: the mean of the last 7 daily-mean air temperatures, minus 0.02 °C for every millimetre of rain in those 7 days (capped at 2 °C). Seven days because a nest 30–50 cm down does not feel a single hot afternoon; it feels the week. The rain term because a soaked beach runs cooler. The 0.02 °C/mm is an assumption, not a fit; there is nothing local to fit it to. The comparison below is shown with no rain term and with double it, and the conclusion does not change.

Weekly nest-temperature proxy (7-day air mean minus rain term), July–September 2024, 2025 and 2026, with the published East Pacific olive ridley transitional range and pivotal temperature shadedpivotal 30.5 °C · both sexes 29.3–31.6 °CLines are AIR, not sand: compare the years with each other, not with the band.a nest held above the band → mostly female; below it → mostly male2526272829303132°CJul 1Jul 15Jul 29Aug 12Aug 26Sep 9Sep 23week starting202420252026
Weekly mean of the daily proxy, July–September. 2026 starts in the week of 22 July (first proxy day 25 July) because the station's sensor array was dead from 15 May to 18 July; it ends at 18 September, the last day on record. 2024 misses the week of 19 August (stuck array). Shaded: the published East Pacific Olive Ridley transitional range, the constant incubation temperatures that give both sexes, with the pivotal temperature dashed (Abreu-Grobois et al. 2020). The lines are air, the band is for sand at nest depth. Sand in the sun usually runs warmer than the air mean, by an amount nobody has measured here, so a line sitting under the band does not mean the nests were making males. Read the gap between the years.
Week starting2024 proxy (°C)20252026Rain 2024 (mm)20252026
Jul 126.627.1—4127—
Jul 827.727.7—1317—
Jul 1528.528.9—1032—
Jul 2227.128.829.051223
Jul 2926.627.727.71042055
Aug 527.327.729.021112
Aug 1227.527.729.83190
Aug 19—28.329.1—632
Aug 2628.328.128.371518
Sep 227.627.529.043302
Sep 925.526.629.4110726
Sep 1628.626.6—748—
Sep 2325.726.2—23425—
Key finding

From 25 July to 18 September, the 2026 air averaged 29.3 °C against 28.2 in 2024 and 28.0 in 2025: +1.1 and +1.2 °C. With less rain on top, the proxy gap widens to +1.7 and +1.3 °C.

Week by week, 2026 ran warmer than 2024 in 6 of 7 comparable weeks (mean +1.8 °C, largest +3.9 in the week of 9 September, when 2024 took 110 mm of rain and 2026 took 6) and warmer than 2025 in 7 of 8 (mean +1.1 °C). The weeks without a gap are 26 August against 2024 and 29 July against 2025, both level. Doubling the assumed rain term moves the gaps to +1.7 and +1.3 °C; dropping it entirely leaves the pure air gaps of +1.1 and +1.2. The sign never changes. The same station's hourly readings show the same thing on the heat and UV page: 2026 warmer at every hour and 6–10 humidity points drier.

The water · NOAA OISST at the site's grid cell

Yes, the sea is warm. The sea is not what heats a nest.

July–September sea-surface temperature against the 1982–2025 average for each month at the 0.25° cell off Saladita.

YearJul–Sep mean (°C)Anomaly vs 1982–202525 Jul–18 Sep meanStation air, same windowRain, same window
202430.58+0.5531.0328.2325 mm
202530.23+0.1930.3228.0178 mm
202631.27+1.2131.2929.3134 mm
What the comparison shows

2026 is the warmest of the three summers at sea (+1.21 °C: July +1.34, August +1.12, September 1–25 +1.16). But 2024's sea in the same window was nearly as warm (31.03 vs 31.29 °C) and its air was 1.1 °C cooler.

Sand at nest depth is heated by the sun and cooled by rain and evaporation; the sea reaches it only indirectly, through the air and the humidity. Week to week over the three summers, sea and air move together only loosely (r = 0.58, 24 weeks). 2024 had a warm sea and a wet late summer (325 mm in the window, more after it); 2026 had a warm sea and a dry one. The owner's instinct is right that this is a warm year. The reason the nests are probably warmer is the warmer, drier air and the scarce rain, not the water directly. The sea record is still useful here: it is an independent instrument, and it agrees the year is warm at a time when the station itself had just been reinstalled (18 July), which is exactly when one should distrust a station.

The thresholds · published, not estimated here

What the literature says the sand has to do.

QuantityValueSource (opened)
Pivotal temperature, East Pacific Olive Ridley (50% female at constant incubation)30.46 °C (95% 30.26–30.66)Abreu-Grobois et al. 2020, Table 5, Bayesian logistic fit to incubations of eggs from La Escobilla, Playa La Destiladeras and El Verde Camacho (Mexico) and Nancite (Costa Rica)
Transitional range (5%→95% female)width 2.24 °C, ≈29.3–31.6 °Csame
La Escobilla eggs at constant temperature27 °C all male; 32 °C all femalesame, Table 1 data
Pivotal estimate for Mexican nesting populations29.95 °CNMFS & USFWS 2014 Olive Ridley 5-Year Review (citing Sandoval-Espinoza 2011); also used by Sandoval et al. 2020
When sex is setmiddle third of incubationNMFS & USFWS 2014 (citing Merchant-Larios et al. 1997); Sandoval et al. 2020
Hatching success, Olive Ridley hatchery, Playa Grande, Costa Rica, 5 seasonsbest at 29–32 °C mean in the 2nd third, 32–35 °C in the last third, 30–32.5 °C over the whole incubation; lower at both endsRutledge et al. 2024
Nests reaching >35 °C at 25–30 cm, Playa Coyote, Costa Ricaemergence 78.9% vs 89.1%; 78.6% of nests female-biased 2013–2017; incubation 45–50 daysBinhammer, Beange & Arauz 2019
Very hot sand"can result in almost zero hatch success"NMFS & USFWS 2014 (citing Sifuentes-Romero et al. 2013)

The curve is steep. On the published fit, a clutch held 1 °C above the pivotal comes out about 93% female and one held 1 °C below about 7% (our arithmetic from the reported pivotal and range, assuming a symmetric logistic curve). A one-degree year is not a small thing if the sand is sitting inside that band.

The direction · qualitative on purpose

More females. Mostly from the late nests.

Expected shift

Warmer, drier sand than 2024–25 tilts the season toward females. In the middle of the season the tilt is probably small, because those nests were likely female-heavy already. The place it can really move is the late season, October to December, when the sand cools through the transitional band and the males come from.

Two published observations support the timing. In a hatchery at Playa Ceuta, Sinaloa (six degrees further north, so cooler than here), sand temperatures logged at 30 cm in 2009 imply almost no males from the July, August and September nests (estimated 0%, 4% and 1%), then 50% in October, 98% in November and 100% in December (Sandoval et al. 2020; these are estimates from temperature, not sexed hatchlings). The US federal status review summarises Mexican data the same way: female-biased at the start of the season, male-biased at the end (NMFS & USFWS 2014). If this coast behaves like that, a warm July–September adds little to a batch that is mostly female already, and moves it closer to the heat that lowers hatching success. The sex-ratio question is decided in the autumn, and a sea running more than a degree warm can keep the autumn sand warm longer. This page will be re-run with October–December when that data exists.

Timing, for anyone matching dates: with 45–55 days of incubation, the middle third falls roughly 15 to 37 days after laying. A warm week in the chart matters most for nests laid two to five weeks before it.

Does it help? · the population answer

A little, in the short run. Not if it becomes normal.

Short run

A female-leaning year can raise future egg output, because one male can fertilise several females.

Clutches with more than one father are documented in Olive Ridleys, more often on the mass-nesting beaches (NMFS & USFWS 2014, citing Jensen et al. 2006). A female lays about two clutches of 100–110 eggs in a season (same review). So a cohort with extra females is, up to a point, a cohort with extra eggs in its future, provided enough males still exist to find them.

Long run

The warning case is the northern Great Barrier Reef: green turtles from its warm nesting beaches are 99.1% female as juveniles and 99.8% as subadults, and the authors say complete feminization of that population is possible in the near future (Jensen et al. 2018).

Two things go wrong when warm years stack up: the male supply thins out, and the hot end of the range starts killing embryos and weakening hatchlings (hatching success falls above the optima in the table; a Mexican Pacific study of hatchlings from a mass-nesting beach found incubation temperature affected hatchling body condition and swimming thrust, Labastida-Estrada et al. 2024).

Scale

One year is one cohort among many. Olive Ridleys mature at a median of about 13 years (range 10–18), so this summer's hatchlings will not nest until around 2039.

Age from the north-central Pacific skeletochronology study, as summarised in the federal review (Zug et al. 2006 in NMFS & USFWS 2014). One warm year shifts one cohort. The number that would matter is how many of the next ten look like 2026.

What the camps can do

Most protected nests here are not on the open beach.

The camps near Saladita collect eggs and rebury them in fenced hatcheries (local camps: Campamento Tortuguero Playa Petatillo, about 10 km away; ECOT in Troncones; Ayotlcalli at Playa Blanca near Zihuatanejo). A hatchery's sand can be managed, so its nests may run cooler or warmer than this proxy.

Practice on this coast

Shade cloth over the hatchery is used on the Guerrero coast.

At the Los Quelonios camp at Playa Ventura, Copala (Costa Chica, Guerrero), relocated Olive Ridley clutches hatched at 83.88% over the 2021–22 season, and the study concludes that the shade cloth (malla sombra) buffers the sun and helps keep incubation temperatures suitable (Galván Moscaira 2024). Some camps also water hatchery sand in hot spells; I found no Mexican Pacific study measuring how much that cools a nest, so no number is given here. Shading cools every nest under it and so pushes toward males as well as away from heat deaths, and a camp manager trades those off. The camps are the people to ask what their hatchery sand actually does.

Honest caveats

Air is not sand. Dry sand in the sun heats well above the air, and wet sand stays cooler. Nest thermometers in Costa Rica read 28.6–34.6 °C at 25–30 cm (Binhammer et al. 2019), a range well above the daily air means here. Nothing at Saladita says how far above, so the proxy's level against the band means nothing; only the difference between years is used.

Depth and lag. Nests sit roughly 30–50 cm down, where the daily swing is damped and changes arrive days late. A 7-day mean is a crude stand-in for that.

Hatcheries. Relocated nests under shade or on managed sand do not follow the open-beach proxy.

Metabolic heating. In the last third of incubation, a clutch of about a hundred embryos warms its own nest. That matters more for survival than for sex, which is set earlier, and the proxy cannot see it.

The station. It sits among trees in the village, not on the beach. Its sensor array was dead from 15 May to 18 July 2026 and stuck on 18–21 August 2024; both gaps are removed, not filled, and the comparison uses only 25 July–18 September, the window all three years share (50, 56 and 56 valid days). The 2026 warm-dry signal began the day the array was reinstalled; the heat page labels it probably real, and the independent sea record points the same way.

The rain coefficient is assumed. 0.02 °C per mm per week, capped at 2 °C. The ranking of the years holds at zero and at double.

Thresholds travel imperfectly. The pivotal estimate pools Mexican and Costa Rican eggs incubated at constant temperature; field nests fluctuate, and the pivotal temperature can vary between beaches.

The sea is warm this year, and so is the air over the beach: about a degree warmer than the last two summers, with less rain. That tilts the nests toward females, and the tilt that matters will come from the October–December nests. A few extra females can mean more eggs in thirteen years. A decade of summers like this one would mean too few males and too many cooked eggs.
Synthesis · 27 September 2026

Sources and method

Data: on-site Ambient Weather station, 5-minute temperature, cleaned exactly as on the heat page (68 spikes >5 °F from a centred 1-h or 3-h median or outside 50–100 °F removed; stuck array 2024-08-18 12:00 → 08-21 06:00 blanked; the dead-array zeros of 2026-05-15 → 07-18 fall outside the bounds). Daily mean = mean of hourly means, ≥20 hours required. Rain from the corrected daily file. Local day UTC−6. Sea: NOAA OISST v2.1 daily, cell 17.875 °N 101.875 °W; monthly normals 1982–2025 from the site's SST climatology.

Script: scripts/analyze_nest_temperature_proxy.py → functions/api/_findings_nest_temperature.js (export FINDINGS_NEST_TEMPERATURE, generated 2026-09-27), served at /api/findings-nest-temperature.

Literature (each opened for this page):

Wibbels (2003) in The Biology of Sea Turtles vol. II is the standard review behind these numbers and is cited by the federal review; I did not open it, so no figure here is taken from it.

Cite as: Conner, A. (2026). "Nest Temperature This Season: A Proxy." La Saladita Field Guide, lasaladita.com/findings/turtle-nest-temperature/, 27 September 2026. Data: on-site station 2024–2026, NOAA OISST v2.1; artifact /api/findings-nest-temperature.

Related